Frachtvertrag

Freight contract or forwarding contract? The crucial difference for your liability

Who owes what, what the liability looks like in each case, and why the freight forwarder is often liable like a carrier.

Whether a contract is a freight contract or a forwarding contract determines who is liable for what and to what extent. The classification depends not on the label, but on the actual contract concluded. Rogert & Ulbrich will correctly classify your contract and enforce your claims against the appropriate contractual partner.

Why the distinction determines your liability

In the transport business, two types of contracts intersect that are easily confused. The freight contract and the forwarding contract obligate parties to different services and lead to different liability regimes. Anyone who fails to distinguish between the two quickly risks directing their claims against the wrong party or underestimating their own liability.

This introductory article defines the terms and refers to more in-depth topics. An overview of our services is provided in the section... transport and forwarding law.

Unsure which contract you have? Have its classification and resulting liability reviewed.

Freight contract: the carrier is responsible for the success of the delivery.

Under a freight contract pursuant to Section 407 of the German Commercial Code (HGB), the carrier undertakes to transport the goods to their destination and deliver them there. He is therefore responsible for the successful completion of the transport. His liability is correspondingly strict.

The carrier is liable under Sections 425 et seq. of the German Commercial Code (HGB) for loss of and damage to the goods from the time of acceptance until delivery, regardless of fault, unless the carrier can prove otherwise. However, this liability is limited in amount; in road freight transport, it is generally capped at 8.33 units of account per kilogram of gross weight according to Section 431 of the HGB. Within a legally defined range, the maximum liability can be contractually adjusted.

How this limitation works and when it is broken is explained in our articles on this topic. Limitation of liability in transport law and to qualified fault according to Article 29 CMR.

Is this a case of damage incurred during transport? Have it checked whether strict carrier liability applies.

Freight forwarding contract: the freight forwarder owes the organization

Under a freight forwarding contract pursuant to Section 453 of the German Commercial Code (HGB), the freight forwarder is not obligated to carry out the transport itself, but rather to arrange the shipment. He organizes the transport, selects the means of transport and the executing companies, and concludes the necessary contracts. He does not undertake the physical transport in this pure form.

Accordingly, his liability is structured differently. Under Section 461 of the German Commercial Code (HGB), a pure freight forwarder is generally liable for his own negligence, particularly negligence in the selection or organization of the carrier, for example, if he engages a demonstrably unreliable carrier. This is often more difficult for the injured party to prove than the carrier's strict liability for the safekeeping of the goods. Therefore, the correct classification of the contract is all the more important.

Was your transport merely organized? Have it checked whether the freight forwarder's liability or the carrier's liability applies.

The three cases in which the freight forwarder is liable like a carrier

In practice, the distinction between organization and transport is often blurred. In three legally defined scenarios, the freight forwarder has the rights and obligations of a carrier with regard to transport and is therefore liable under the stricter rules of freight law.

  • Self-entry: If the freight forwarder carries out the transport himself, for example with his own vehicles, Section 458 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) applies and he is liable like a carrier.
  • Fixed-cost forwarding: If the freight forwarder agrees on a fixed remuneration that includes transport costs, Section 459 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) applies. This is the most common case in practice.
  • Groupage shipment: If the freight forwarder transports the goods together with goods from other shippers in a consolidated shipment, Section 460 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) applies with the same consequences.

Because fixed-cost forwarding is practically the norm, the vast majority of forwarding agents are liable like carriers anyway. This surprises many clients and forwarding agents alike and is of great importance for enforcing claims.

Have you agreed on a fixed freight rate? Have it checked whether your freight forwarder is liable like a carrier.

It's not the label that counts, but the contract.

For legal classification purposes, it is not decisive what a company calls itself or what a contract is titled. What matters is the actual content agreed upon. A transaction described as a forwarding contract may, upon closer examination, turn out to be a freight contract, and vice versa.

Therefore, in the event of a dispute, it is worthwhile to carefully examine the agreed-upon services, the pricing, and the actual execution. Only this interpretation reveals which liability regime applies and against whom claims can be directed. A hasty classification based solely on the description often leads to misunderstandings.

We support you in clearly drafting such contracts within the framework of the Drafting of transport and forwarding contracts.

Is it unclear what type of contract it is? Have the contract classified according to its actual content.

What this means for you and how to proceed

For senders, recipients, and service providers, correct classification leads to concrete steps. The following checklist will help:

  • Determine performance: Clarify whether only the organization or also the transportation was owed.
  • Check compensation: Pay attention to a fixed freight rate, which indicates a fixed-cost forwarding company and therefore carrier liability.
  • Identify the defendant: Identify against whom your claims are directed and against which other parties recourse is possible.
  • Review liability regimes: Determine whether strict liability for custody or liability for organizational negligence applies.
  • Drafting contracts: Clearly define performance, remuneration, and liability to avoid later disputes over demarcation.

Because the correct classification can determine the success or failure of a claim, early legal review is worthwhile. We classify your contract, determine the liability regime, and enforce your claims. The clearer the legal basis, the stronger your position.

Do you want to properly classify your contracts and claims? Have your case reviewed.

Rogert & Ulbrich – Your lawyers in transport and forwarding law

Rogert & Ulbrich advises shippers, consignees, freight forwarders, and carriers on the distinction between freight and forwarding contracts and the resulting liability issues. The lawyers Dr. Marco Rogert and Tobias Ulbrich and their team are familiar with Sections 407 et seq. and 453 et seq. of the German Commercial Code (HGB) and the practice of contract drafting from their daily work.

We classify your contract according to its actual content, determine the liability regime, and enforce your claims against the correct partner. For cross-border transport, we take the following into account: CMR Convention.

Whether it's a disputed contract type, the wrong defendant, or the contract drafting: Agree on one initial consultation and secure your position.

FAQs – Frequently Asked Questions about Freight and Forwarding Contracts