CMR Convention – Liability and claims in international road freight transport
hire a lawyer now
What shippers, freight forwarders and carriers need to know about international transport law
The CMR (Convention relative au contrat de transport international de marchandises par route) is the central set of rules for international road freight transport. It applies by law to every cross-border road transport between two CMR contracting states – regardless of any contractual agreements between the parties. Rogert & Ulbrich advises and represents companies in disputes concerning liability, damages, and the enforcement of claims under the CMR.
Enforce legal claims in just 3 steps
Simple, convenient & fast – we enforce your rights.
commissioning
Give us your mandate easily and conveniently via online form from home.
1lawsuit & trial
We will take care of all the remaining steps for you. Sit back and relax.
2Success
We will successfully enforce your claim and you can enjoy the success immediately.
3Fundamentals of CMR
Scope and mandatory nature
The CMR Convention applies automatically when a transport contract for the carriage of goods by road for remuneration is concluded with the points of departure and destination in different countries, at least one of which is a CMR contracting state. Currently, more than 55 countries have ratified the CMR Convention, including all EU member states, Switzerland, Norway, Turkey, and several Central Asian countries.
The mandatory nature of the CMR is a key feature: Deviating agreements that directly or indirectly exclude or reduce the carrier's liability are void according to Article 41 of the CMR. This means that even if the contract of carriage or the carrier's general terms and conditions contain a different provision, the CMR applies. This provides strong protection for shippers and a clear limit to contract drafting for carriers.
Removals, postal shipments, mortuary transport, and combined transport on certain segments are not covered by the CMR, provided special agreements apply (e.g., COTIF on rail). For multimodal transport, the CMR generally applies to the road leg.
Rogert & Ulbrich will check whether the CMR is applicable to your specific transport case and what consequences this has for your claims.
We will take care of your case – quickly & with commitment.
Carrier's liability under CMR
Principle and exceptions
According to Article 17 CMR, the carrier is liable for total or partial loss and damage to the goods that occurs between acceptance and delivery, as well as for exceeding the delivery period.
Liability is strict – the carrier is generally liable without proof of fault. However, the carrier can be exempted from liability by proving certain grounds for exemption (Art. 17 para. 2 CMR): unavoidable events that could not have been prevented even with the utmost care; instructions from the person in charge of the goods; defects in the goods themselves; or circumstances that the carrier could not avoid.
In addition, Article 17(4) CMR provides for special grounds for exemption from liability, which only apply if the goods were transported in open, uncovered vehicles or if there are special risks in the handling of live animals, the loading and unloading by the sender or the special nature of the goods.
For shippers, this means that in the event of loss or damage, the carrier must actively prove that a ground for exemption exists. If they cannot, they are liable. Rogert & Ulbrich supports shippers in demanding this proof and consistently enforcing their claims.
Limits of liability and how to overcome them
Articles 23 and 29 CMR
The CMR limits the carrier's liability to 8.33 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) per kilogram of gross weight of the damaged or lost goods (Article 23, paragraph 3 CMR). This limit is often considerably lower than the actual value of the goods.
For shippers handling high-value cargo, this is a significant limitation. However, there are ways to overcome the liability limit:
- Declaration of value (Art. 24 CMR): The sender can declare the value of the shipment on the waybill and pay a surcharge. In this case, the carrier is liable up to the declared value.
- Special interest in the delivery (Art. 26 CMR): For damages caused by delay, the sender may specify a special interest that increases liability to the stated amount.
- Qualified fault (Art. 29 CMR): In cases of intent or fault equivalent to intent on the part of the carrier or its employees, all liability limits are waived. Gross negligence can be considered equivalent to intent under national law – in Germany, the courts regularly affirm this. This is a key argument in cases of substantial damage.
Rogert & Ulbrich systematically examines whether Article 29 CMR is applicable in your case in order to break the liability limit and claim the full damages.
Damage notification, deadlines and preclusion
what shippers absolutely must consider
The CMR contains strict deadlines, the failure to meet which can result in the irretrievable loss of claims. This is one of the most common pitfalls in practice.
- Visible damage: Any defects must be reported to the carrier upon delivery. If no complaint is made, delivery is deemed to be in order (Art. 30 para. 1 CMR). Therefore, any visible damage must be reported in writing immediately upon acceptance of the goods.
- Undetected damage: Claims must be submitted in writing within seven days of delivery (Art. 30 para. 1 CMR). If this deadline is missed, the claim expires.
- Damages due to delay: Claims must be reported in writing within 21 days of delivery (Art. 30 para. 3 CMR).
- Statute of limitations: The limitation period for CMR claims is generally one year, but three years in cases of intent or gross negligence (Art. 32 CMR). The period begins on the day of delivery, or, in the case of loss, on the 30th day after the expiry of the agreed delivery period.
If you have been notified of transport damage or have discovered such damage yourself, immediate action is required. Rogert & Ulbrich ensures deadlines are met, documents the damage in a manner admissible in court, and initiates claims without delay.
Jurisdiction under the CMR
where a lawsuit can be filed
A significant practical advantage of the CMR for shippers is the flexible jurisdiction provision. According to Article 31 of the CMR, the plaintiff can choose between the court of the state where the defendant is domiciled or has his principal place of business, the court of the state where the goods were taken over, and the court of the state where the goods were delivered or were to be delivered.
This allows a German shipper to sue a Polish or Dutch carrier in German courts – provided the goods were taken over or delivered in Germany. This is a significant advantage, as the shipper operates within their familiar legal system.
Rogert & Ulbrich strategically uses these jurisdiction options to secure the best possible procedural position for you.
Practical points of contention
Partial damages, delays and documentation
Besides the total loss of the transported goods, partial damage and delays are the most frequent points of contention under the CMR.
In the case of partial damage, the carrier is liable for the damaged part under the same conditions as in the case of total loss. Documentation is crucial: photos of the damage upon delivery, a written reservation in the delivery receipt, and a professional damage assessment significantly increase the chances of success.
According to Article 23(5) of the CMR Convention, damages for delay are limited to the freight charge – unless the sender has declared a special interest in delivery (Article 26 CMR) or a case falls under Article 29 CMR. In practice, therefore, damages for delay are often not fully recoverable if no value declaration has been made.
A common mistake in practice: The recipient accepts the goods without reservation, even though external damage is visible. This means they forfeit all claims arising from recognizable damage. Train your receiving staff accordingly – and contact Rogert & Ulbrich if damage has already occurred.
FAQs – Frequently Asked Questions about the CMR Convention
Rogert & Ulbrich – Your lawyers in transport and forwarding law
Rogert & Ulbrich is a Düsseldorf-based law firm specializing in transport and freight forwarding law. Dr. Marco Rogert and Tobias Ulbrich advise and represent shippers, freight forwarders, and carriers in cross-border transport disputes under the CMR, the CMNI, and other international transport law conventions. The firm has a multilingual team and is experienced in coordinating claims against foreign carriers and insurers.
Rogert & Ulbrich ensures deadlines are met, assesses liability situations, and systematically examines whether Article 29 CMR applies. The firm represents clients before German and European courts and coordinates internationally active correspondent lawyers when the carrier is based abroad.
Damage incurred during transport? Every day counts when it comes to meeting deadlines. Get in touch and secure your claims.
Professional advice & support
We offer you professional and comprehensive initial advice in the area of transport and forwarding law. Take your chance and avoid mistakes.
