PEI and RKI refuse to evaluate vaccine damage – those affected remain without support
The refusal of the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) to evaluate health insurance data on vaccine damage was first discussed on television. Post-vaccine syndrome has not been recognized for almost four years, leaving affected patients without financial assistance. A "Plusminus" report shows how a 29-year-old woman receives no support from the social security office despite medical certificates because crucial data is missing. Stefan Homburg published the report to raise awareness of the issue.
https://x.com/shomburg/status/1859311422351736881?s=48&t=IukkkKsepMawFWgV1p8fDQ
Covered-up vaccine damage in public broadcasting
Severe vaccine injuries are being ignored – for years, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Paul Koch Institute (PEI) have refused to collect the necessary data and obstructed reporting by the statutory health insurance associations. Instead of providing help for those affected, there is only cover-up and trivialization. Lauterbach fails to intervene, despite promises of help. The consequences are serious: the extent of the damage is being downplayed, and those affected are left to fend for themselves. https://x.com/shomburg/status/1859478472378228917?s=48&t=IukkkKsepMawFWgV1p8fDQ
DrBines Newsletter – Pfizer’s Confessions
In a paper, Pfizer admits to using outdated gene therapy technology for its COVID-19 vaccine BNT162B2 and acknowledges autoimmune risks. The paper downplays BioNTech's role and omits key facts about the immune response from a figure. DrBine examines the science and PR manipulation behind Pfizer's claims and questions the safety standards actually followed.
https://drbine.substack.com/p/pfizer-verwendete-ein-altes-gentherapieplasmid?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
SV40 enhancers in vaccines: A clever feature or a risky mistake?
A 2007 study showed that DNA vaccines can only trigger a strong immune response if they contain the SV40 enhancer element. This element allows the genetic information to be integrated into the cell nucleus, leading to a significantly stronger immune response. Could the use of SV40 in modern vaccines and the booster with MPOX be part of a larger plan? To what extent might these genetic elements have been intentionally incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of vaccines? The question remains: Was the SV40 enhancer a clever feature or a risky flaw?
https://drbine.substack.com/p/2007-wusste-man-sv40-ist-notwendig?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
