On May 14, 2025, I experienced an unusual day in court as a litigation representative. The focus was on the assertion of damages claims by a vaccine victim after using Spikevax (Moderna). A notable moment was the statement by the presiding judge, who appeared wearing an FFP2 mask and justified his decision by citing his multiple vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2. This unexpected insight into the presiding judge's personal precautionary measure sheds light on current medical and legal debates.
Read the full article here.
English 
German 
Dutch