Aussonderung

Motorhome paid for and never received – enforce segregation under Section 47 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO).

Why payment alone does not confer ownership and how to check whether your vehicle belongs to the insolvency estate

The purchase price has been paid, the motorhome is still at the dealership, and then comes the insolvency. Whether you can demand the vehicle back or are referred to the quota depends on a single question: Have you already become the legal owner? Rogert & Ulbrich reviews your documents according to a clear procedure and enforces the segregation of the vehicle.

The crucial difference: Payment is not ownership

Many people assume that they own the vehicle as soon as the purchase price is paid in full. This is not legally correct. German law strictly distinguishes between the purchase contract, which only establishes the obligation to transfer ownership, and the acquisition of ownership itself. Whoever has paid has a right to the transfer of ownership. However, this does not automatically make them the owner.

Everything hinges on this distinction in insolvency proceedings:

  • Property acquiredThe vehicle is not part of the insolvency estate. You can separate it from the insolvency estate under Section 47 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO), i.e., demand its return, regardless of any distribution quota.
  • Ownership not acquiredYou only have a claim to ownership. The insolvency administrator can refuse performance pursuant to Section 103 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO). Your claim for repayment then becomes a simple insolvency claim pursuant to Section 38 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO) and is therefore subject to the distribution quota.

The financial gap between the two outcomes is enormous. For a motorhome in the mid-five-figure range, the full return of the property is often only a low single-digit percentage in many cases, and payment is only made years later. Therefore, it is worthwhile to carefully examine every single indication of a completed transfer of ownership.

Therefore, do not check whether you have paid, but whether ownership has been transferred. These are two different questions, and only the second one determines your vehicle.

The checklist: When ownership of the motorhome transfers

Ownership of a movable object is transferred according to §§ 929 ff. of the German Civil Code (BGB). This requires an agreement on the transfer of ownership and physical delivery or a legally recognized substitute for delivery. The law provides for four variations, and in insolvency cases, the substitute forms are particularly relevant.

  • Agreement and handoverThe standard case according to § 929 sentence 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB): You have picked up the vehicle or it has been delivered to you. In this case, the transfer of ownership is usually straightforward.
  • Existing propertyAccording to § 929 sentence 2 of the German Civil Code (BGB), a mere agreement is sufficient if you already have the vehicle in your possession, for example after a longer trial period or an early transfer.
  • Possession constitutionAccording to § 930 of the German Civil Code (BGB), physical delivery can be replaced by agreeing on a specific arrangement for the transfer of possession. The dealer then holds the vehicle in safekeeping for you. This option is the most important in cases of insolvency because the vehicle is typically still located on the dealer's premises.
  • Assignment of the right to demand surrender: According to § 931 BGB, if the vehicle is located at a third party, such as a body manufacturer or a workshop.

The decisive factor in establishing possession is the substance of the agreement, not its wording. A mere statement that the vehicle will be picked up is insufficient. A concrete legal relationship is required, clearly demonstrating that the dealer now possesses the vehicle on your behalf, such as a safekeeping or storage agreement with its own provisions regarding costs, duration, and liability.

Therefore, specifically look for documents that prove an agreement and safekeeping, and not just the purchase contract. These documents are precisely what will decide the matter.

Which documents support the disposal

Proving ownership is the practical core of every segregation procedure. The insolvency administrator will initially allocate the vehicle to the insolvency estate because it is located on the company premises and listed in the inventory. You must demonstrate and prove that it already belongs to you.

Experience has shown that these documents are the most informative:

  • IndividualizationThe purchase agreement and invoice must specify the exact vehicle, ideally including the vehicle identification number (VIN). A generic description without individualization is not sufficient for disposal.
  • Vehicle registration certificate Part IIIt is not proof of ownership or a document of title, but it is strong evidence. If it was handed over to you, this suggests an agreement on the transfer of ownership.
  • Handover or acceptance protocolEven without physical possession, a signed protocol can prove that the transaction should be completed.
  • Custody agreement: Any written agreement regarding storage, location, winter storage or delivery date, from which a relationship of possession arises.
  • LabelingPhotos of a sticker, reservation card or a note with your name on the vehicle, plus witnesses from the sales conversation.
  • correspondenceEmails and messages in which the dealer refers to the vehicle as yours or confirms a collection.

Secure these documents immediately and completely before access to customer portals is deactivated. We have described the other recovery options after a provider insolvency in our article. Camping provider insolvent compiled.

If the merchant's bank is already the secured creditor

One hurdle that surprises many affected parties: the dealer was often no longer the owner of the vehicle at the time of sale. Motorhome dealers regularly finance their inventory through purchase financing and transfer ownership of the vehicles to the financing bank as security. When the dealer sells such a vehicle, they are dealing with someone else's property.

In this situation, acquisition in good faith according to § 932 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is possible; if purchasing from a merchant, acquisition of the power of disposal in good faith according to § 366 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) is also possible. Your good faith is then decisive. Case law sets high standards for motor vehicles: Anyone who fails to request to see the vehicle registration certificate, Part II, is generally considered to be acting with gross negligence and does not acquire the vehicle in good faith.

This has two practical consequences:

  • Examination before purchaseAsk to see the vehicle registration certificate, Part II, and check who is listed on it. A dealer who cannot show it often doesn't have the vehicle readily available.
  • Examination in insolvency proceedingsIf a bank claims to be the secured creditor, it is necessary to clarify when the security transfer took place, whether it covered the specific vehicle, and whether you acted in good faith when you acquired it.

Another point concerns the right to challenge transactions in insolvency proceedings. If the transfer of ownership to you occurred shortly before the insolvency application, the administrator can challenge it under the conditions of Sections 129 et seq. of the German Insolvency Code (InsO). However, in the case of a simultaneous exchange of the purchase price and the vehicle, the protection of cash transactions under Section 142 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO) generally applies. If there is a significant time gap between payment and transfer of ownership, the situation is more complex and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Therefore, do not make any statements to the administrator or bank until these points have been clarified. You can find more articles about vehicles in our section. Automotive, We will address questions about the bank in the banking law.

What the Camper Base case shows about practice

The insolvency of Camper Base Rhein-Main in the summer of 2024 clearly illustrated a pattern that recurs in several cases within the industry. The insolvency petition was filed at the end of July 2024, but according to the findings of the proceedings, the company had already been insolvent prior to that. Nevertheless, payments continued to be accepted from customers, in some cases just days before the commencement of the proceedings and under duress.

Affected customers had paid in full but never received their vehicles. Reports documented a case in which a buyer had spent a five-figure sum on a motorhome, selling his house to do so, only to receive neither the vehicle nor the necessary paperwork. The Darmstadt public prosecutor's office investigated on suspicion of delaying insolvency proceedings, and criminal charges for fraud were also filed. Other motorhome dealers, such as CMS Reisemobile GmbH from Röthenbach, also entered insolvency proceedings during this period.

This leads to three lessons for legal processing:

  • Documents without vehicleSome customers had already received vehicle documents. This is a serious indication of an agreement and should be evaluated during the disposal inspection.
  • Payments shortly before applicationIf payment was demanded even though insolvency had already occurred, claims against the persons involved may be considered, for example for delaying insolvency proceedings or for fraud.
  • Use the creditors' meeting: Appointments in the proceedings are an opportunity to obtain information on the vehicle inventory and its disposal, which can be crucial for one's own disposal.

File a criminal complaint only after prior review, so that civil enforcement is not hindered. Our website provides information on claims in cases of fraudulent activity. Online fraud.

This is how you enforce the separation process

The right to segregation is asserted against the insolvency administrator. It is not an application in the insolvency proceedings and not a claim, but rather an assertion that a specific item does not belong to the estate. The administrator examines the matter, releases it, or rejects it. If the request is rejected, the plaintiff can still file a lawsuit for its release.

The sensible procedure:

  • Register for disposal: Written claim to the administrator with vehicle name, vehicle identification number and complete evidence of agreement and compensation for handover.
  • Stop recycling: Simultaneously object to the disposal, so that the vehicle is not sold during the ongoing proceedings.
  • Register a claim as a subsidiary claimAs long as the segregation is not recognized, the claim should be registered in the schedule of claims pursuant to Section 174 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO) as a precautionary measure. These two actions are not mutually exclusive.
  • Check replacement disposalIf the vehicle has already been sold, the consideration may be segregated in accordance with Section 48 of the German Insolvency Code (InsO). This examination is time-critical.
  • Further opponents secure: Check parallel chargeback deadlines for credit card or direct debit, objections against a financing bank and claims against management.

Act quickly, as disposal decisions are made early in the process. We will address general questions about the vehicle in the [section/section/etc.]. traffic law.

Rogert & Ulbrich – Your lawyers for the disposal of the paid-for motorhome

Rogert & Ulbrich represents consumers nationwide at the intersection of sales law, property law, and insolvency law. Attorneys Dr. Marco Rogert and Tobias Ulbrich and their team are familiar with existing financing in the motorhome trade, the typical security structures of the banks involved, and the auditing standards of insolvency administrators.

We will evaluate your documents according to the verification process for the transfer of ownership, notify the administrator of the segregation of the assets, and object to their sale. Simultaneously, we will secure the registration of your claim, examine the possibility of substitute segregation, and investigate claims against the bank, payment service provider, and other parties involved. If the segregation is rejected, we will also enforce the claim for surrender through legal action.

Did you pay for a motorhome but never receive it? Contact us for a free consultation and have your documents checked before the vehicle is scrapped.

FAQs – Frequently asked questions about segregation according to § 47 InsO