{"id":19223,"date":"2021-07-02T12:32:02","date_gmt":"2021-07-02T10:32:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=19223"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:27","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:27","slug":"landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"Arrondissementsrechtbank M\u00f6nchengladbach oordeelt tegen Daimler AG"},"content":{"rendered":"

Op 30 juni 2021 heeft de Arrondissementsrechtbank van M\u00f6nchengladbach in het voordeel van onze cli\u00ebnt en tegen Daimler AG beslist. In de procedure (zaak nr. 6 O 89\/20) is de betwiste Mercedes-Benz<\/a> GLK 250 BT 4M om te bepalen dat een ontoelaatbare uitschakelinrichting<\/a> is ge\u00efnstalleerd. Als gevolg hiervan ontvangt de eiser de koopprijs minus compensatie voor gebruik<\/a> in de hoeveelheid van \u20ac 20.271,-<\/strong> opnieuw. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

De rechtbank maakt duidelijk dat de Programmering van de motorbesturingssoftware illegaal<\/strong> is. Dat wil zeggen dat de betreffende Mercedes-Benz GLK 250 BT 4M is uitgerust met diverse voorzieningen die onderscheid maken tussen de situatie op de testbank en de situatie daarbuiten. Wij zijn van mening dat dit bevestigt dat Daimler AG de wettelijke emissiegrenswaarden heeft gemanipuleerd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ook bij Daimler AG zijn illegale manipulatie-instrumenten bevestigd<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Steeds meer concessies nu ook bij Daimler AG. Ook de voertuigen met het motortype OM651 worden getroffen door illegale manipulatie-instrumenten, zelfs zonder bevestigde KBA-terugroepactie<\/a>. Momenteel worden er steeds meer Verslaggeving <\/a>tegen Daimler AG en besliste in het voordeel van de consument. Dit komt onder meer doordat Daimler AG niet afdoende kan aantonen dat er geen illegale manipulatie-instrumenten in Mercedes-Benz-voertuigen zijn ge\u00efnstalleerd. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

Misschien bent u ook ge\u00efnteresseerd in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Abgasskandal\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tBaanbrekende uitspraak in emissieschandaal tegen Daimler<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

De regionale rechtbank van Stuttgart biedt zekerheid. Daimler AG is door de regionale rechtbank van Stuttgart veroordeeld tot het betalen van schadevergoeding wegens\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tvzbv dient opnieuw een model declaratoir verzoek in \u2013 Volkswagen wordt gevolgd door Daimler AG<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Slecht nieuws voor de autofabrikanten uit Stuttgart. De Federale Vereniging van Consumentenorganisaties (vzbv) wordt\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jp\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tVerjaringstermijn bij Mercedes-Benz eind 2021<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Rijdt u een Mercedes-Benz GLC, V-Klasse, Vito of Marco Polo? Dan moet u er rekening mee houden dat\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr unseren Mandanten und gegen die Daimler AG. In dem Verfahren (Az. 6 O 89\/20) ist beim streitgegenst\u00e4ndlichen Mercedes-Benz […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":19250,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,507],"tags":[757,18,876,28,30],"class_list":["post-19223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","category-urteile","tag-abgasskandal","tag-daimler","tag-mercedes-benz","tag-nutzungsentschaedigung","tag-om651"],"yoast_head":"\nLandgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nl_NL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":206,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Daimler\",\"Mercedes-Benz\",\"Nutzungsentsch\u00e4digung\",\"OM651\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Urteile\"],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\",\"name\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\\\/20).\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675,\"caption\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet f\u00fcr Kl\u00e4ger. Illegale Abschalteinrichtung best\u00e4tigt bei Daimler AG.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/nl\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U","description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","og_locale":"nl_NL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG","og_description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG","datePublished":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"},"wordCount":206,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","keywords":["Abgasskandal","Daimler","Mercedes-Benz","Nutzungsentsch\u00e4digung","OM651"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal","Urteile"],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","name":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nl-NL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet f\u00fcr Kl\u00e4ger. Illegale Abschalteinrichtung best\u00e4tigt bei Daimler AG."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumentenadvocaten","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Advocatenkantoor Rogert & Ulbrich","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-150x150.jpg",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-300x169.jpg",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-768x432.jpg",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr unseren Mandanten und gegen die Daimler AG. In dem Verfahren (Az. 6 O 89\/20) ist beim streitgegenst\u00e4ndlichen Mercedes-Benz […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19223\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}