{"id":12064,"date":"2020-11-24T11:29:57","date_gmt":"2020-11-24T10:29:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=12064"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:44","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:44","slug":"mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/","title":{"rendered":"Mercedes-emissieschandaal: regionale rechtbank van Stuttgart willigt rechtszaak in"},"content":{"rendered":"

11.000+ EUR compensatie voor de E-Klasse bestuurder<\/strong>.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

De Arrondissementsrechtbank van Stuttgart veroordeelde Daimler-Benz AG tot betaling van 11.327,90 euro als tegenprestatie voor de teruggave van het voertuig van eiser, een Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI met emissieklasse Euro 5 en OM 651-motor.
Eiser had de auto in 2013 tweedehands gekocht voor 35.500 euro en er bijna 155.000 km mee gereden. Bij de berekening van de gebruiksvergoeding ging de rechtbank uit van een totaal afgelegde kilometerstand van 250.000 km.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De Mercedes-Benz<\/a> Het Hof verwierp het argument dat het voertuig voldeed aan de emissiegrenswaarden voor stikstofoxiden bij de wettelijk voorgeschreven tests.
Volgens de relevante jurisprudentie moeten de grenswaarden die in bijlage I bij Verordening (EG) nr. 715\/2007 zijn vastgelegd, ook onder re\u00eble rijomstandigheden in acht worden genomen, zo staat in het arrest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De gevolgen voor Mercedes-bezitters: waardeverlies en dreigende voertuigimmobilisatie<\/strong>.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Daimler-Benz AG heeft in dit kader voertuigen op de markt gebracht en EG-typegoedkeuring verkregen zonder te voldoen aan de vereiste dat de stikstofoxide-emissies onder re\u00eble rijomstandigheden de grenswaarden van bijlage I bij Verordening (EG) nr. 71512007 niet overschrijden. Daarmee komt het voortbestaan van de EG-typegoedkeuring in gevaar. Als de registratie door de Federale Motortransportautoriteit wordt ingetrokken en de exploitatievergunning verloopt, loopt iedere eigenaar het risico dat zijn voertuig uit de roulatie wordt genomen. Op dezelfde manier loopt elk voertuig het risico op een enorme waardevermindering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De ontstane schade is veroorzaakt door nalatigheid van medewerkers van Daimler-Benz AG. Het voldoet niet aan de zorgvuldigheidseisen binnen de goedkeuringsprocedure voor een voertuigtype als een autofabrikant ervan uitgaat dat het doorstaan van de testbanktesten voldoende is. De Verordening en het bijbehorende wettelijk kader leveren geen bewijs voor deze veronderstelling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

Misschien bent u ook ge\u00efnteresseerd in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Diesel-Benzin-Preise\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tRecordprijzen voor diesel - Nu is het moment om uw auto terug te draaien<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Diesel staat in Duitsland op recordhoogte en ook benzine nadert een\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLees meer<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tVTDI-emissieschandaal waarbij VW, Audi en Porsche betrokken zijn<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Voor veel Duitse autofabrikanten is het dieselemissieschandaal nog steeds alomtegenwoordig, ook voor de VW Groep\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLees meer<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tAudi AG moet Porsche Cayenne S terugnemen<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Audi AG kreeg van het Oberlandesgericht Keulen de opdracht een Porsche Cayenne S 4.2l terug te nemen\u2026.\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLees meer<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

11.000+ EUR Schadensersatz f\u00fcr den E-Klasse Fahrer. Das Landgericht Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler-Benz AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme des Fahrzeugs des Kl\u00e4gers, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":12091,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,507],"tags":[18,133,30],"class_list":["post-12064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","category-urteile","tag-daimler","tag-mercedes","tag-om651"],"yoast_head":"\nMercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nl_NL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":272,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Daimler\",\"Mercedes\",\"OM651\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Urteile\"],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/\",\"name\":\"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675,\"caption\":\"Daimler Abgasskandal Mercedes E-Klasse\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"nl-NL\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/nl\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt - R&U","description":"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/","og_locale":"nl_NL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt","og_description":"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt","datePublished":"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/"},"wordCount":272,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg","keywords":["Daimler","Mercedes","OM651"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal","Urteile"],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/","name":"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-24T10:29:57+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:44+00:00","description":"Das LG Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme einen Mercedes Benz E-Klasse 220 CDI.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nl-NL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Daimler Abgasskandal Mercedes E-Klasse"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/mercedes-abgasskandal-landgericht-stuttgart-gibt-klage-statt\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mercedes-Abgasskandal: Landgericht Stuttgart gibt Klage statt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumentenadvocaten","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"nl-NL"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Advocatenkantoor Rogert & Ulbrich","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nl-NL","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe-150x150.jpg",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe-300x169.jpg",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe-768x432.jpg",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/daimler-abgasskandal-mercedes-e-classe.jpg",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"11.000+ EUR Schadensersatz f\u00fcr den E-Klasse Fahrer. Das Landgericht Stuttgart verurteilte die Daimler-Benz AG zur Zahlung von 11.327,90 Euro gegen R\u00fccknahme des Fahrzeugs des Kl\u00e4gers, […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}