{"id":26158,"date":"2022-02-10T09:12:31","date_gmt":"2022-02-10T08:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=26158"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:00","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:00","slug":"urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment against Daimler AG \u2013 intentional immoral damage"},"content":{"rendered":"

In its judgment of January 28, 2022, the Stuttgart Regional Court ordered Daimler AG to pay the plaintiff represented by us damages of \u20ac 13,526 against return of the vehicle (case number 17 O 711\/19). The vehicle in question is a Mercedes Benz GLK 220 CDI 4Matic<\/a> of the Euro 5 emissions class. The affected Mercedes has a OM651 engine<\/a> The plaintiff bought this as a new car for a purchase price of \u20ac 47,349. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The LG affirmed a claim for damages pursuant to. \u00a7 826 BGB<\/a> for intentional immoral damage. The vehicle in question did not comply with the requirements of the EC Regulation 715\/2007<\/a>According to this regulation, manufacturers are obliged, among other things, to comply with the specified limit values and not to impermissible shutdown devices<\/a>which reduce the effectiveness of emission control systems. Vehicles must therefore comply with the specified limit values under normal operating conditions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daimler AG violated EC Regulation 715\/2007 with the vehicle in question. The vehicle was not equipped accordingly, so that the legally stipulated limit values for nitrogen oxide emissions were not met under normal operating conditions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implied deception through placing on the market <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The fact that Daimler AG has placed the vehicle on the market represents an implicit deception. Placing the vehicle on the market signals that "the vehicle complies with the applicable regulations and fulfils its objective purpose of being used on the road". <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This deception caused the buyer concrete damage. If the limits are not complied with, there is a risk of the registration being revoked and the vehicle being taken out of service. This would result in a significant loss of value. The plaintiff therefore bought a vehicle that did not correspond to the contract. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The chances of suing Daimler AG are increasing enormously!<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

More and more courts are ordering Daimler AG to pay damages.<\/a> This fact increases the chances for all Daimler drivers enormously. We therefore recommend that you let your claims<\/a> Check with us free of charge and without obligation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

You might also be interested in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tvzbv files another model declaratory action \u2013 Volkswagen is followed by Daimler AG<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Bad news for the car manufacturers from Stuttgart. The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) is being\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jp\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLimitation period at Mercedes-Benz at the end of 2021<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Do you drive a Mercedes-Benz GLC, V-Class, Vito or Marco Polo? Then you should note that...\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tJudgment against Daimler AG \u2013 Damages for Mercedes Sprinter<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Freiburg Regional Court sentenced Daimler AG to pay damages in the amount of \u20ac 82,592 against return\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Das Landgericht (LG) Stuttgart hat mit Urteil vom 28.01.2022 die Daimler AG verurteilt, dem durch uns vertretenen Kl\u00e4ger einen Schadensersatz in H\u00f6he von \u20ac 13.526,- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":26163,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,507],"tags":[895,18,23,697,876,30,35,37],"class_list":["post-26158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","category-urteile","tag-abschalteinrichtung","tag-daimler","tag-euro-5","tag-kba","tag-mercedes-benz","tag-om651","tag-rueckruf","tag-schadensersatz"],"yoast_head":"\nUrteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":341,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Abschalteinrichtung\",\"Daimler\",\"Euro-5\",\"KBA\",\"Mercedes-Benz\",\"OM651\",\"R\u00fcckruf\",\"Schadensersatz\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Urteile\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/\",\"name\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/en\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung - R&U","description":"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung","og_description":"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung","datePublished":"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/"},"wordCount":341,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png","keywords":["Abschalteinrichtung","Daimler","Euro-5","KBA","Mercedes-Benz","OM651","R\u00fcckruf","Schadensersatz"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal","Urteile"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/","name":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png","datePublished":"2022-02-10T08:12:31+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:00+00:00","description":"LG Stuttgart verurteilt Daimler AG zur Zahlung von Schadensersatz! Eine konkludente T\u00e4uschung durch das Inverkehrbringen liegt vor.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidrige Sch\u00e4digung"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumer lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Rogert & Ulbrich Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-150x150.png",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-300x169.png",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-768x432.png",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-1024x576.png",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Das Landgericht (LG) Stuttgart hat mit Urteil vom 28.01.2022 die Daimler AG verurteilt, dem durch uns vertretenen Kl\u00e4ger einen Schadensersatz in H\u00f6he von \u20ac 13.526,- […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26158\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}