{"id":22555,"date":"2021-11-17T09:16:46","date_gmt":"2021-11-17T08:16:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=22555"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:08","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:08","slug":"urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment against Daimler AG \u2013 Damages for Mercedes Sprinter"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Freiburg Regional Court ordered Daimler AG to pay damages of \u20ac 82,592 to a plaintiff in return for the return of the vehicles (judgment of October 18, 2021, case number 6 O 149\/19). The case concerned three Mercedes Sprinter 316 CDI<\/a>The plaintiff purchased the three vehicles between February 2016 and August 2018 for a total price of \u20ac 111,960. The Sprinter class vehicles have the engine typeOM 651<\/a>(Euro 6 and Euro 5). This engine is said to be equipped with various illegal switch-off devices. The nitrogen oxide emissions are controlled via the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The EGR is controlled by the outside temperature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the plaintiff\u2019s Mercedes Sprinters is also subject to a mandatory recall by the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Intentional and immoral actions by Daimler AG<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Freiburg Regional Court sees in this case an intentional immoral injury to the plaintiff according to \u00a7 826 BGB due to the use of impermissible switch-off devices. The plaintiff has therefore already suffered damage through the purchase, as the vehicle did not comply with the legal requirements of EC Regulation 715\/2007. The Regional Court also evaluates, among other things, the coolant target temperature control, the thermal window <\/a>and the different operating modes of the SCR catalyst as an inadmissible switch-off device. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The coolant target temperature control means that the temperature of the coolant and the engine oil is artificially kept low at the start of the engine operation. This results in low emissions of nitrogen oxides. In real driving conditions, however, this function is deactivated and the legal limit of 180 mg\/km is significantly exceeded. The thermal window also manipulates the exhaust gas purification, because here too optimization only takes place on the test bench and not in real driving conditions.  
One of the vehicles also has an SCR catalyst. The urea mixture AdBlue is used to clean the engine's exhaust gases. Here, too, there are different operating modes that influence and ultimately manipulate the exhaust gas purification. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chances against Daimler AG increase enormously<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If you are the owner of an affected Sprinter, you should now chance of possible compensation<\/a> We offer you, without obligation and free of charge, to have your claims checked.<\/a> Thanks to our specially created database, we can immediately track whether your vehicle is also affected. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

You might also be interested in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tvzbv files another model declaratory action \u2013 Volkswagen is followed by Daimler AG<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Bad news for the car manufacturers from Stuttgart. The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) is being\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jp\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLimitation period at Mercedes-Benz at the end of 2021<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Do you drive a Mercedes-Benz GLC, V-Class, Vito or Marco Polo? Then you should note that...\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tJudgment against Daimler AG \u2013 intentional immoral damage<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

In its judgment of January 28, 2022, the Stuttgart Regional Court (LG) sentenced Daimler AG to\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Das Landgericht Freiburg verurteilte die Daimler AG Schadensersatz in H\u00f6he von \u20ac 82.592,- gegen R\u00fcckgabe der Fahrzeuge an einen Kl\u00e4ger zu zahlen (Urteil vom 18.10.2021, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":22561,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,507],"tags":[895,18,23,24,876,30,37,1005],"class_list":["post-22555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","category-urteile","tag-abschalteinrichtung","tag-daimler","tag-euro-5","tag-euro-6","tag-mercedes-benz","tag-om651","tag-schadensersatz","tag-sprinter"],"yoast_head":"\nUrteil gegen Daimler AG - Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Das Landgericht Freiburg sieht ein vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidriges Handeln der Daimler AG aufgrund illegaler Abschalteinrichtung.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Das Landgericht Freiburg sieht ein vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidriges Handeln der Daimler AG aufgrund illegaler Abschalteinrichtung.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":382,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abschalteinrichtung\",\"Daimler\",\"Euro-5\",\"Euro-6\",\"Mercedes-Benz\",\"OM651\",\"Schadensersatz\",\"Sprinter\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Urteile\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/\",\"name\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Das Landgericht Freiburg sieht ein vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidriges Handeln der Daimler AG aufgrund illegaler Abschalteinrichtung.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/en\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judgment against Daimler AG - Damages for Mercedes Sprinter - R&U","description":"The Freiburg Regional Court sees Daimler AG as having acted deliberately immorally due to an illegal defeat device.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG - Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter","og_description":"Das Landgericht Freiburg sieht ein vors\u00e4tzlich sittenwidriges Handeln der Daimler AG aufgrund illegaler Abschalteinrichtung.","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter","datePublished":"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/"},"wordCount":382,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg","keywords":["Abschalteinrichtung","Daimler","Euro-5","Euro-6","Mercedes-Benz","OM651","Schadensersatz","Sprinter"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal","Urteile"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/","name":"Judgment against Daimler AG - Damages for Mercedes Sprinter - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg","datePublished":"2021-11-17T08:16:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:08+00:00","description":"The Freiburg Regional Court sees Daimler AG as having acted deliberately immorally due to an illegal defeat device.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Urteil gegen Daimler AG – Schadensersatz f\u00fcr Mercedes Sprinter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumer lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Rogert & Ulbrich Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter-150x150.jpg",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter-300x169.jpg",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter-768x432.jpg",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Daimler-Sprinter.jpg",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Das Landgericht Freiburg verurteilte die Daimler AG Schadensersatz in H\u00f6he von \u20ac 82.592,- gegen R\u00fcckgabe der Fahrzeuge an einen Kl\u00e4ger zu zahlen (Urteil vom 18.10.2021, […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22555\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}