{"id":20452,"date":"2021-08-17T12:20:17","date_gmt":"2021-08-17T10:20:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=20452"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:21","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:21","slug":"dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cDiesel scandal 2.0\u201d \u2013 R&U wins groundbreaking decision and informs about the current case law surrounding the EA288 diesel engine"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg (OLG) made it clear in its advisory decision of 1 July 2021, case no. 14 U 91\/21, that the plaintiff represented by us had provided tangible evidence of the use of an inadmissible defeat device in his vehicle with the engine EA288<\/a> delivered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The built-in function distinguishes between two operating modes, one of which is active exclusively on the test bench and ensures that the prescribed limits are adhered to. In real driving conditions, however, the limits are still exceeded. The test bench is controlled by a so-called "test bench" (test bench). curve detection<\/a> The judges of the Higher Regional Court consider all of this to be obvious and reject Volkswagen AG's denial as insufficient. They argue that the company is merely "hiding" behind previous measurements by the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OLG Naumburg also Decision of 19 July 2019<\/a>, Ref. No. 8 U 1\/21, that it intended to award the plaintiff, represented by the law firm Rogert & Ulbrich, a claim for damages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The installed shutdown device in the engine of type EA288 EU6 with SCR catalyst<\/a> is also considered inadmissible here. The court considered the plaintiff's factual submissions to be sufficiently substantiated. Recently published internal documents from Volkswagen AG as well as expert opinions obtained by the company itself also show that different operating strategies exist. With the help of the so-called driving curve recognition, the test bench is recognized, whereupon a specific operating strategy is activated, which in turn increases the exhaust gas recirculation rate on the test bench. The aim here is to reliably comply with the legally prescribed limits only on the test bench. How switching between the various operating strategies affects the vehicle's emissions behavior in real driving conditions on the road is irrelevant. The mere fact that these functions were intended solely to bring about a different exhaust gas purification behavior during the test bench than is the case in real driving conditions already makes the defeat devices inadmissible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More and more courts are following suit \u2013 things are getting tighter for Volkswagen<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Higher Regional Court of Naumburg had already ruled in parallel proceedings in its judgment of April 9, 2021, case no. 5 O 90\/20, that there was immoral intentional damage in a car equipped with an EA288 engine because an inadmissible defeat device in the form of a driving cycle detection system was used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now the LG Bielefeld is making its third consumer-friendly decision in the matter EA288<\/a> after:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In their judgment of 21 July 2021, case no. 8 O 467\/20, the judges awarded the plaintiff a claim for damages. The subject matter of the dispute was a VW Golf VII 1.6 TDI Sportsvan<\/a>The plaintiff's vehicle is equipped with an EA288 EU6 engine with a NOx storage catalyst. It also features a curve detection system.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bielefeld Regional Court considers it immoral conduct that the engine control software is deliberately and intentionally programmed to ensure compliance with statutory emissions limits only on the test bench using an illegal defeat device. The court also finds Volkswagen AG's objections insufficient. The driving curve recognition was intended to achieve a better emissions value than in real-life driving on the road through test recognition during the type approval process. VW thus deliberately deceived the buyers of these vehicles. The plaintiff, in fact, trusted that the vehicle in question and the engine installed in it were proper and compliant with the law.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thermal window in EA288 diesel vehicle entitles to withdrawal from the purchase contract<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In its advisory ruling of August 9, 2021, case no. 12 U 4671\/19, the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court ruled that the case law of the European Court of Justice (judgment of December 17, 2020, case no. C-692\/18), and thus our submission, should be followed, according to which a defeat device in the context of exhaust gas recirculation is inadmissible under European law. In these proceedings, the purchaser of a Seat vehicle with an EA288 diesel engine is asserting warranty claims against the vehicle dealer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, according to the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court, the vehicle was deemed to be defective due to the undisputed presence of a "thermal window" in the vehicle with the EA288 engine type at the time of delivery. This, in turn, entitled the plaintiff to withdraw from the purchase contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BGH rules: Claim for compensation for the loss in value when purchasing a VW diesel with test bench recognition software<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its judgment of July 6, 2021, case no. VI ZR 40\/20, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that the purchaser of a Volkswagen with a diesel engine equipped with test bench recognition software may be entitled to compensation for the "minimum value" - so-called minor damages - from the vehicle manufacturer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The vehicle in dispute in the proceedings, a VW Passat Variant, which is equipped with the 2.0-liter diesel engine of the type EA189 EU5, has software that detects whether the vehicle is in test operation on the test bench and then optimizes the nitrogen oxide emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Such software for the purpose of test bench recognition is also installed in vehicles with the EA288 engine type in the form of driving curve recognition, so a parallel can be drawn here with the EA288 engine type. The Federal Court of Justice's ruling should therefore further increase the chances of success for cases involving the successor engine to the "scandal engine." <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prospects for success in the \u201cdiesel scandal 2.0\u201d are steadily increasing<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

From all the aforementioned decisions, as well as numerous other judgments and rulings from various regional and higher regional courts, it is clear that the prospects of success in proceedings concerning the EA288 engine type are steadily increasing. Further information on the topic, as well as a non-exhaustive overview of judgments, can be found on our website at https:\/\/ru.law\/expertise\/abgasskandal\/ea288\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please feel free to take advantage of our free and non-binding initial consultation and have your claim examined individually.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

You might also be interested in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tVW has to accept another ruling in favor of an injured VW driver with an EA288 engine<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Before the Berlin Regional Court (case number: 13 O 37\/20), the plaintiff was awarded damages in the amount of\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Abgasskandal\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tUnauthorized shutdown device also in the EA288<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The turning point in the EA288 emissions scandal is coming. There is another reason why the prospects of success with the EA288\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Abschalteinrichtung\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tOLG Naumburg considers defeat device in VW T6 with EA288 engine and EU6 approval to be inadmissible<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Naumburg Higher Regional Court ruled in its decision of July 19, 2021, ref. no.: 8 U 11\/21,\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Das Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg (OLG) hat mit Hinweisbeschluss vom 1. Juli 2021, Az. 14 U 91\/21, deutlich gemacht, dass der durch uns vertretene Kl\u00e4ger durch seinen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":20502,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[895,20,24,878],"class_list":["post-20452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","tag-abschalteinrichtung","tag-ea288","tag-euro-6","tag-fahrkurvenerkennung"],"yoast_head":"\n\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Das OLG Oldenburg hat mit Hinweisbeschluss deutlich gemacht, dass greifbare Anhaltspunkte f\u00fcr die Verwendung einer unzul\u00e4ssigen Abschalteinrichtung bei dem EA288-Dieselmotor vorliegen. Auch andere Gerichte ziehen nach.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Das OLG Oldenburg hat mit Hinweisbeschluss deutlich gemacht, dass greifbare Anhaltspunkte f\u00fcr die Verwendung einer unzul\u00e4ssigen Abschalteinrichtung bei dem EA288-Dieselmotor vorliegen. Auch andere Gerichte ziehen nach.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":930,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abschalteinrichtung\",\"EA288\",\"Euro-6\",\"Fahrkurvenerkennung\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00\",\"description\":\"Das OLG Oldenburg hat mit Hinweisbeschluss deutlich gemacht, dass greifbare Anhaltspunkte f\u00fcr die Verwendung einer unzul\u00e4ssigen Abschalteinrichtung bei dem EA288-Dieselmotor vorliegen. Auch andere Gerichte ziehen nach.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/en\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201eDiesel Scandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U secures landmark ruling and informs about current case law surrounding the EA288 diesel engine - R&U","description":"The Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg has made it clear in a preliminary ruling that there is concrete evidence of the use of an illegal defeat device in the EA288 diesel engine. Other courts are following suit.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor","og_description":"Das OLG Oldenburg hat mit Hinweisbeschluss deutlich gemacht, dass greifbare Anhaltspunkte f\u00fcr die Verwendung einer unzul\u00e4ssigen Abschalteinrichtung bei dem EA288-Dieselmotor vorliegen. Auch andere Gerichte ziehen nach.","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor","datePublished":"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/"},"wordCount":930,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg","keywords":["Abschalteinrichtung","EA288","Euro-6","Fahrkurvenerkennung"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/","name":"\u201eDiesel Scandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U secures landmark ruling and informs about current case law surrounding the EA288 diesel engine - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg","datePublished":"2021-08-17T10:20:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:21+00:00","description":"The Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg has made it clear in a preliminary ruling that there is concrete evidence of the use of an illegal defeat device in the EA288 diesel engine. Other courts are following suit.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/dieselskandal-2-0-ru-erstreitet-wegweisenden-beschluss-und-informiert-ueber-die-aktuelle-rechtsprechung-rund-um-den-ea288-dieselmotor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201eDieselskandal 2.0\u201c \u2013 R&U erstreitet wegweisenden Beschluss und informiert \u00fcber die aktuelle Rechtsprechung rund um den EA288-Dieselmotor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumer lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Rogert & Ulbrich Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss-150x150.jpg",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss-300x169.jpg",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss-768x432.jpg",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/rogert-ulbrich-rechtsanwalt-kanzlei-abgasskandal-ea288-beschluss.jpg",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Das Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg (OLG) hat mit Hinweisbeschluss vom 1. Juli 2021, Az. 14 U 91\/21, deutlich gemacht, dass der durch uns vertretene Kl\u00e4ger durch seinen […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20452\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}