{"id":19223,"date":"2021-07-02T12:32:02","date_gmt":"2021-07-02T10:32:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=19223"},"modified":"2024-07-08T13:12:27","modified_gmt":"2024-07-08T11:12:27","slug":"landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"M\u00f6nchengladbach Regional Court rules against Daimler AG"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 30 June 2021, the M\u00f6nchengladbach Regional Court ruled in favour of our client and against Daimler AG. In the proceedings (case no. 6 O 89\/20), the disputed Mercedes Benz<\/a> GLK 250 BT 4M to determine that a impermissible shutdown device<\/a> As a result, the plaintiff will receive the purchase price after returning his vehicle, less compensation for use<\/a> in the amount of \u20ac 20.271,-<\/strong> again. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The court makes it clear that the Programming of the engine control software illegal<\/strong> This means that the Mercedes-Benz GLK 250 BT 4M in question has various devices installed that differentiate between a situation on the test bench and outside the test bench. In our view, this confirms that Daimler AG has manipulated statutory emissions limits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Illegal defeat devices also confirmed at Daimler AG<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

More and more concessions are now also being made by Daimler AG. The vehicles with the OM651 engine type are also affected by illegal defeat devices even without confirmed KBA recall<\/a>. Currently, more and more Proceedings <\/a>against Daimler AG and decided in favor of consumers. This is due, among other things, to the fact that Daimler AG is unable to adequately demonstrate that no illegal defeat devices are installed in Mercedes-Benz vehicles. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>
\n
<\/div>
\n

You might also be interested in:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Abgasskandal\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tGroundbreaking ruling in the emissions scandal against Daimler<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Stuttgart Regional Court provides certainty. Daimler AG was sentenced by the Stuttgart Regional Court to pay damages because of\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tvzbv files another model declaratory action \u2013 Volkswagen is followed by Daimler AG<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Bad news for the car manufacturers from Stuttgart. The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) is being\u2026\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jp\"\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\tLimitation period at Mercedes-Benz at the end of 2021<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Do you drive a Mercedes-Benz GLC, V-Class, Vito or Marco Polo? Then you should note that...\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/article>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr unseren Mandanten und gegen die Daimler AG. In dem Verfahren (Az. 6 O 89\/20) ist beim streitgegenst\u00e4ndlichen Mercedes-Benz […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":19250,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,507],"tags":[757,18,876,28,30],"class_list":["post-19223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-abgasskandal","category-urteile","tag-abgasskandal","tag-daimler","tag-mercedes-benz","tag-nutzungsentschaedigung","tag-om651"],"yoast_head":"\nLandgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":206,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Daimler\",\"Mercedes-Benz\",\"Nutzungsentsch\u00e4digung\",\"OM651\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Abgasskandal\",\"Urteile\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\",\"name\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\\\/20).\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675,\"caption\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet f\u00fcr Kl\u00e4ger. Illegale Abschalteinrichtung best\u00e4tigt bei Daimler AG.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/en\\\/author\\\/rogertru-law\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U","description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG","og_description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG","datePublished":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"},"wordCount":206,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","keywords":["Abgasskandal","Daimler","Mercedes-Benz","Nutzungsentsch\u00e4digung","OM651"],"articleSection":["Abgasskandal","Urteile"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/","name":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG - R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-02T10:32:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-08T11:12:27+00:00","description":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr den Kl\u00e4ger (Az. 6 O 89\/20).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet f\u00fcr Kl\u00e4ger. Illegale Abschalteinrichtung best\u00e4tigt bei Daimler AG."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/landgericht-moenchengladbach-entscheidet-gegen-daimler-ag\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach entscheidet gegen Daimler AG"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumer lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Rogert & Ulbrich Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-150x150.jpg",96,96,true],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-300x169.jpg",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-768x432.jpg",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",1200,675,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-positive-Urteile72.jpg",18,10,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/author\/rogertru-law\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Am 30.06.2021 entschied das Landgericht M\u00f6nchengladbach f\u00fcr unseren Mandanten und gegen die Daimler AG. In dem Verfahren (Az. 6 O 89\/20) ist beim streitgegenst\u00e4ndlichen Mercedes-Benz […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19223\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}