{"id":100070,"date":"2026-07-02T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?p=100070"},"modified":"2026-06-29T11:55:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T09:55:44","slug":"lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/","title":{"rendered":"Wuppertal Regional Court on the insufficient range of electric cars \u2013 the ruling explained in an easy-to-understand way"},"content":{"rendered":"

What the regional court's decision means for buyers of electric cars and where its limits lie.<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Wuppertal Regional Court has ruled that an electric car that falls short of its advertised WLTP range by approximately 18 percent has a significant defect and can be returned. This article explains the details of the ruling, its broader implications beyond this specific case, and which buyers it affects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the Wuppertal verdict was about<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The lawsuit was brought by a buyer who had purchased an electric car for \u20ac39,000. The manufacturer and dealer had advertised the vehicle with a WLTP range of 332 to 341 kilometers, both in the vehicle catalog and on the dealer's website. However, according to the buyer, in everyday use the car achieved a maximum range of approximately 160 kilometers, regardless of driving style. He stated that he drove the car exclusively in Eco mode at low average speeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The court commissioned an independent expert. Under standardized WLTP conditions, this expert determined a range of only 282 kilometers. This meant the vehicle fell approximately 18 percent short of the advertised range. The expert attributed the discrepancy to advanced aging of the drive battery, which had progressed faster than would have been expected given the buyer's driving and charging habits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Wuppertal Regional Court ruled in favor of the buyer (judgment of December 18, 2025, case no. 10 O 282\/23). It found a significant defect and upheld the buyer's right to rescind the contract. The dealer must take back the vehicle and refund the purchase price to the buyer, less a usage fee, upon return of the car. According to media reports, the vehicle in question was a Peugeot e-2008 GT, although the model is not explicitly mentioned in the published judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is your electric car falling far short of its advertised range in everyday use? Have your case checked to see if it's comparable to the situation in Wuppertal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How the court justified the finding of material defect<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The core issue was whether the stated range is legally binding at all. The dealer argued that the WLTP values were merely averages and not a binding agreement on the vehicle's specifications. The court rejected this argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Section 434 of the German Civil Code (BGB), a vehicle must possess the characteristics that the buyer may expect based on public statements made by the manufacturer. The court considered the range specifications from the catalog and website to be such public statements. They therefore define the usual and expected characteristics of the vehicle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To determine when a deviation becomes significant, the court referred to the Federal Court of Justice's jurisprudence on increased fuel consumption in combustion engine vehicles. There, a deviation of more than ten percent from the standard value is considered a significant defect justifying rescission of the contract. The regional court applied this line of reasoning to the range of electric cars. Since the deviation here was around 18 percent, the threshold was clearly exceeded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scale of measurement is also important. The expert did not test the vehicle based on a typical everyday drive, but under WLTP conditions. This meant that the manufacturer's specifications were compared with the exact procedure used to advertise them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether the deviation in your case reaches the relevant threshold can only be assessed through an expert review. We will classify your case in this context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why the verdict has significance beyond the individual case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Range is not a secondary consideration for an electric car. It determines whether the vehicle is suitable for commuting, longer journeys, or vacations. That's precisely why the significance of this ruling extends beyond the specific case. It demonstrates that manufacturers and dealers must be held accountable for their range specifications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This ruling is not an isolated case. Another case concerning a Porsche Taycan is underway at the Osnabr\u00fcck Regional Court, where the court has ordered an expert report on the vehicle's range. There, too, the court is taking a potential range deficiency seriously. The issue is therefore being addressed by several courts simultaneously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite its significance, this ruling requires context. It is a decision of a regional court, a court of first instance. It is not binding on other courts, and each case is assessed individually. The ruling is a strong argument, but it does not automatically lead to a different outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A single ruling is no substitute for a review of your contract. We'll show you how the Wuppertal ruling can be applied to your situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For which electric car buyers is the ruling relevant?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Not every deviation in range leads to a return. The ruling primarily helps buyers in similar situations. Three points are crucial here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • Significant deviation: <\/strong>The further the actual range falls below the advertised WLTP value, the sooner the threshold of significance is reached.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Measurement under test conditions: <\/strong>The decisive factor is the comparison under conditions close to WLTP, not a single journey in extreme weather.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • No explanation through normal aging: <\/strong>If the loss cannot be explained solely by normal battery aging, this suggests a defect.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    Less promising, however, are cases where the deviation is small and within the range of usual tolerances, or where a shorter range was explicitly agreed upon. The ruling therefore does not mean that every kilometer below the WLTP value justifies a cancellation of the contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Are you unsure whether your deviation is sufficient? An initial assessment will provide clarity before you take action with the dealer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    What you as an affected buyer should conclude from the ruling<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The ruling offers concrete lessons for affected buyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    • Document reach: <\/strong>Keep track of how far you can actually travel on a full charge over several trips.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Secure advertising: <\/strong>Keep the catalog, website information and purchase agreement with the advertised WLTP values.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Expert measurement: <\/strong>An assessment under conditions close to WLTP is often the decisive proof.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Please observe the deadlines: <\/strong>Claims for defects in a new car typically expire two years after delivery.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Rogert & Ulbrich has developed the legal mechanics behind such cases, from the assessment of defects and contract rescission to compensation for use, in tens of thousands of proceedings related to the emissions scandal. The firm is now applying this experience to range and battery issues concerning electric vehicles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Do not sign any settlement offer from the dealer until you know what you are giving up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The sooner your case is reviewed, the more options you have. Secure your claims while the deadlines are still open.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Rogert & Ulbrich \u2013 Your lawyers specializing in electric vehicle defect law<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Rogert & Ulbrich represents consumers nationwide in vehicle defect law. The law firm of Dr. Marco Rogert and Tobias Ulbrich has handled over 40,000 cases and filed more than 25,000 lawsuits in the emissions scandal. This experience in litigation is now benefiting buyers of electric cars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      We will review your range or battery issue, assess your claims, and negotiate out-of-court settlements with the retailer and manufacturer. If no satisfactory solution can be reached, we will enforce your rights in court, from contract cancellation and price reduction to compensation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Is your electric car significantly falling short of its promised range, as in the case of Wuppertal? Get in touch and secure your rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      FAQs \u2013 Frequently asked questions about the Wuppertal Regional Court ruling<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n
      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhat exactly did the Wuppertal Regional Court decide?<\/span><\/div>

      The court ruled that an electric car that falls short of its advertised WLTP range by approximately 18 percent has a significant defect. The buyer was therefore entitled to rescind the purchase agreement. The dealer must take back the vehicle and refund the purchase price, less a usage fee, upon return of the car. The judgment was issued on December 18, 2025 (Case No. 10 O 282\/23).<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhich vehicle was the subject of the ruling?<\/span><\/div>

      The published ruling does not explicitly name the model and anonymizes the parties involved. According to media reports, it was a Peugeot e-2008 GT. The vehicle had been purchased for \u20ac39,000. However, for the legal assessment, the brand is irrelevant; what matters is the deviation from the advertised range.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tHow large was the range deviation in the Wuppertal case?<\/span><\/div>

      The advertised WLTP range was 332 to 341 kilometers. A court-appointed expert determined a range of only 282 kilometers under WLTP conditions. This corresponds to a deviation of approximately 18 percent. This was significantly above the ten percent threshold that the court considered substantial.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhy did the court consider the WLTP figure to be decisive?<\/span><\/div>

      The dealer had argued that the WLTP values were merely averages. The court, however, considered the information in the catalog and on the website to be public statements within the meaning of Section 434 of the German Civil Code (BGB). Such statements define the characteristics that a buyer can expect. Therefore, the vehicle must be measured against the advertised WLTP value.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhat role did battery aging play in the proceedings?<\/span><\/div>

      The expert determined that the traction battery had aged faster than would have been expected given the buyer's driving and charging habits. He considered this an indication of a vehicle defect. The insufficient range could therefore not be explained solely by normal wear and tear. This supported the assumption of a material defect.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tIs the ruling binding for other electric car buyers?<\/span><\/div>

      No. This is a decision by a regional court in a specific case. Other courts are not bound by it and assess each case independently. Nevertheless, the ruling carries significant weight because it applies an established precedent set by the Federal Court of Justice to electric cars.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tDoes this ruling also apply to other manufacturers and models?<\/span><\/div>

      The legal justification is not limited to a specific brand. The decisive factor is whether the actual range falls significantly short of the advertised WLTP value. This means the argument is generally applicable to electric cars from various manufacturers. Whether it applies in a particular case depends on the specific discrepancy and the available evidence.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhat does the verdict mean for me if my deviation is less than 18 percent?<\/span><\/div>

      The 18 percent figure was the specific value in this case, not a fixed limit. The ten percent guideline from the German Federal Court of Justice's (BGH) case law on combustion engines serves as a point of reference. If your deviation is below this threshold, proving its significance is more difficult, but not always impossible. An individual assessment is particularly advisable here.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tHow much money did the buyer get back in the Wuppertal case?<\/span><\/div>

      The buyer received a refund of the purchase price, less a usage fee for the kilometers driven. According to available reports, the dealer was ordered to pay approximately \u20ac33,750 plus interest, upon return of the vehicle. The exact amount always depends on the purchase price and mileage. Higher mileage results in a correspondingly higher usage fee.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

      \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tWhen should I consult a lawyer?<\/span><\/div>

      Ideally, you should do this before making any binding declarations to the dealer or accepting a settlement offer. An early review ensures deadlines are met and clarifies whether your case is comparable to the Wuppertal situation. Many clients have legal expenses insurance that covers the costs of enforcement in traffic and contract law matters. Coverage can be inquired about in advance. Rogert & Ulbrich will review your case and advise you on the best course of action.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Was die Entscheidung des Landgerichts f\u00fcr K\u00e4ufer von Elektroautos bedeutet und wo ihre Grenzen liegen Das Landgericht Wuppertal hat entschieden, dass ein Elektroauto, das die […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":100072,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1320],"tags":[1533,1536,1534,1535,1537],"class_list":["post-100070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-automotive","tag-e-auto","tag-elektroauto","tag-reichweite","tag-urteil","tag-zu-geringe-reichweite"],"yoast_head":"\nLG Wuppertal: E-Auto-Reichweite als Sachmangel erkl\u00e4rt- R&U<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R&U\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marco Rogert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@RogertUlbrich\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\"},\"headline\":\"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1151,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"e-auto\",\"elektroauto\",\"reichweite\",\"urteil\",\"zu geringe reichweite\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Automotive\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/\",\"name\":\"LG Wuppertal: E-Auto-Reichweite als Sachmangel erkl\u00e4rt- R&U\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707,\"caption\":\"Low battery caution display on screen of a car malfunction, The battery voltage signal is dropping and low on car multimedia screen of EV electric vehicle car, EV electric vehicle technology concept.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"name\":\"R&U\",\"description\":\"Verbraucheranw\u00e4lte\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo-ru-law.svg\",\"width\":992,\"height\":259,\"caption\":\"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/RogertUlbrich\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rogertulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/rogert-ulbrich\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87\",\"name\":\"Marco Rogert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/ru-law-rogert.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/ru-law-rogert.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/ru-law-rogert.png\",\"caption\":\"Marco Rogert\"},\"description\":\"Dr. Marco Rogert ist Rechtsanwalt und zweifacher Fachanwalt mit Sitz in D\u00fcsseldorf. Er ber\u00e4t und vertritt Mandanten bundesweit im Bank- und Kapitalanlagerecht, bei Kryptobetrug und KI-rechtlichen Fragen sowie im Transport- und Speditionsrecht. Bekannt wurde er als einer der f\u00fchrenden Anw\u00e4lte in der Aufarbeitung des Abgasskandals und als Mitbegr\u00fcnder der ersten Musterfeststellungsklage gegen die Volkswagen AG.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/rechtsanwalt\\\/dr-marco-rogert\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/marco-prof-dr-rogert-248037407\\\/\"],\"honorificPrefix\":\"Dr\",\"knowsAbout\":[\"Bank- und Kapitalmarktrecht\",\"Transport- und Speditionsrecht\",\"KI-Recht\",\"Kryptobetrug\",\"Abgasskandal\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ru.law\\\/rechtsanwalt\\\/dr-marco-rogert\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"LG Wuppertal: E-Auto-Reichweite als Sachmangel erkl\u00e4rt- R&U","description":"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt","og_description":"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.","og_url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/","og_site_name":"R&U","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marco Rogert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@RogertUlbrich","twitter_site":"@RogertUlbrich","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/"},"author":{"name":"Marco Rogert","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87"},"headline":"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt","datePublished":"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/"},"wordCount":1151,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg","keywords":["e-auto","elektroauto","reichweite","urteil","zu geringe reichweite"],"articleSection":["Automotive"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/","name":"LG Wuppertal: E-Auto-Reichweite als Sachmangel erkl\u00e4rt- R&U","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg","datePublished":"2026-07-02T06:00:00+00:00","description":"Das LG Wuppertal wertet eine 18-Prozent-Abweichung von der WLTP-Reichweite als Sachmangel. Was das Urteil f\u00fcr E-Auto-K\u00e4ufer bedeutet.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg","width":2560,"height":1707,"caption":"Low battery caution display on screen of a car malfunction, The battery voltage signal is dropping and low on car multimedia screen of EV electric vehicle car, EV electric vehicle technology concept."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/lg-wuppertal-e-auto-reichweite-urteil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/ru.law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"LG Wuppertal zur zu geringen E-Auto-Reichweite \u2013 das Urteil verst\u00e4ndlich erkl\u00e4rt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","name":"R&U","description":"Consumer lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Rogert & Ulbrich","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ru.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#organization","name":"Rogert & Ulbrich Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo-ru-law.svg","width":992,"height":259,"caption":"Kanzlei Rogert & Ulbrich"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RogertUlbrich\/","https:\/\/x.com\/RogertUlbrich","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rogertulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/rogert-ulbrich\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCganCgpvwpPFqMFf1vVmG2A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/#\/schema\/person\/b020d506e6bbc471b4565d3a98173b87","name":"Marco Rogert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ru-law-rogert.png","url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ru-law-rogert.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ru-law-rogert.png","caption":"Marco Rogert"},"description":"Dr. Marco Rogert is a lawyer and certified specialist in two areas of law, based in D\u00fcsseldorf. He advises and represents clients nationwide in banking and investment law, cryptocurrency fraud and AI-related legal issues, as well as in transport and freight forwarding law. He became known as one of the leading lawyers in the handling of the emissions scandal and as a co-founder of the first model declaratory action against Volkswagen AG.","sameAs":["https:\/\/ru.law\/rechtsanwalt\/dr-marco-rogert\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/marco-prof-dr-rogert-248037407\/"],"honorificPrefix":"Dr","knowsAbout":["Bank- und Kapitalmarktrecht","Transport- und Speditionsrecht","KI-Recht","Kryptobetrug","Abgasskandal"],"url":"https:\/\/ru.law\/rechtsanwalt\/dr-marco-rogert\/"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg",2560,1707,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg",128,85,false],"medium":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg",2560,1707,false],"medium_large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-768x512.jpeg",768,512,true],"large":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-scaled.jpeg",2560,1707,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-1536x1024.jpeg",1536,1024,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-2048x1365.jpeg",2048,1365,true],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/ru.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/AdobeStock_637981028-18x12.jpeg",18,12,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Marco Rogert","author_link":"https:\/\/ru.law\/rechtsanwalt\/dr-marco-rogert\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Was die Entscheidung des Landgerichts f\u00fcr K\u00e4ufer von Elektroautos bedeutet und wo ihre Grenzen liegen Das Landgericht Wuppertal hat entschieden, dass ein Elektroauto, das die […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100070"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100070\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100088,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100070\/revisions\/100088"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ru.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}