<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sprinter Archive - R&amp;U</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ru.law/en/tag/sprinter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ru.law/en/tag/sprinter/</link>
	<description>Consumer lawyers</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:12:08 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	hourly	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Urteil gegen Daimler AG &#8211; Schadensersatz für Mercedes Sprinter</title>
		<link>https://ru.law/en/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco Rogert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:16:46 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abgasskandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urteile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abschalteinrichtung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daimler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro-6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes-Benz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OM651]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schadensersatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprinter]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">https://ru.law/?p=22555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Freiburg Regional Court ordered Daimler AG to pay damages of €82,592 in return for the return of the vehicles to a plaintiff (judgment of October 18, 2021, […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://ru.law/en/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter/">Urteil gegen Daimler AG &#8211; Schadensersatz für Mercedes Sprinter</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://ru.law/en">R&amp;U</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Freiburg Regional Court ordered Daimler AG to pay damages of € 82,592 to a plaintiff in return for the return of the vehicles (judgment of October 18, 2021, case number 6 O 149/19). The case concerned three&nbsp;<a href="https://ru.law/en/expertise/abgasskandal/mercedes-benz-diesel/#modelle">Mercedes Sprinter 316 CDI</a>The plaintiff purchased the three vehicles between February 2016 and August 2018 for a total price of € 111,960. The Sprinter class vehicles have the engine type<a href="https://ru.law/en/expertise/abgasskandal/mercedes-benz-diesel/#motor">OM 651</a>(Euro 6 and Euro 5). This engine is said to be equipped with various illegal switch-off devices. The nitrogen oxide emissions are controlled via the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The EGR is controlled by the outside temperature.&nbsp;</p>



<p>One of the plaintiff’s Mercedes Sprinters is also subject to a mandatory recall by the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA). </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-vorsatzliches-und-sittenwidriges-handeln-der-daimler-ag">Intentional and immoral actions by Daimler AG</h2>



<p>The Freiburg Regional Court sees in this case an intentional immoral injury to the plaintiff according to § 826 BGB due to the use of impermissible switch-off devices. The plaintiff has therefore already suffered damage through the purchase, as the vehicle did not comply with the legal requirements of EC Regulation 715/2007. The Regional Court also evaluates, among other things, the coolant target temperature control, the&nbsp;<a href="https://youtu.be/GFE5WsgAcjc" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">thermal window&nbsp;</a>and the different operating modes of the SCR catalyst as an inadmissible switch-off device.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The coolant target temperature control means that the temperature of the coolant and the engine oil is artificially kept low at the start of the engine operation. This results in low emissions of nitrogen oxides. In real driving conditions, however, this function is deactivated and the legal limit of 180 mg/km is significantly exceeded. The thermal window also manipulates the exhaust gas purification, because here too optimization only takes place on the test bench and not in real driving conditions.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>One of the vehicles also has an SCR catalyst. The urea mixture AdBlue is used to clean the engine&#039;s exhaust gases. Here, too, there are different operating modes that influence and ultimately manipulate the exhaust gas purification.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-chancen-gegen-daimler-ag-steigen-enorm">Chances against Daimler AG increase enormously</h3>



<p>If you are the owner of an affected Sprinter, you should now&nbsp;<a href="https://ru.law/en/expertise/abgasskandal/mercedes-benz-diesel/#mandat">chance of possible compensation</a>&nbsp;We offer you, without obligation and free of charge,&nbsp;<a href="https://ru.law/en/expertise/abgasskandal/mercedes-benz-diesel/#erstberatung">to have your claims checked.</a>&nbsp;Thanks to our specially created database, we can immediately track whether your vehicle is also affected.&nbsp;</p>



<section class="wp-block-uagb-columns uagb-columns__wrap uagb-columns__background-undefined uagb-columns__stack-mobile uagb-columns__valign-undefined uagb-columns__gap-10 alignundefined uagb-block-cb0693ee contrast blog_beitraege"><div class="uagb-columns__overlay"></div><div class="uagb-columns__inner-wrap uagb-columns__columns-1">
<div class="wp-block-uagb-column uagb-column__wrap uagb-column__background-undefined uagb-block-afab5f44"><div class="uagb-column__overlay"></div><div class="uagb-column__inner-wrap">
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-das-konnte-sie-auch-interessieren">You might also be interested in:</h3>



			<div class="wp-block-uagb-post-grid uagb-post-grid  uagb-post__image-position-top uagb-post__image-enabled uagb-block-11382567     uagb-post__items uagb-post__columns-3 is-grid uagb-post__columns-tablet-2 uagb-post__columns-mobile-1 uagb-post__equal-height" data-total="9" style="">

												<article class="uagb-post__inner-wrap">								<div class='uagb-post__image'>
									<a href="https://ru.law/en/musterfeststellungsklage-gegen-die-daimler-ag/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer" class='uagb-image-ratio-inherit'><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwalts-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-Musterfestellungsklage72-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large" alt="" srcset="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwalts-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-Musterfestellungsklage72-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwalts-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-Musterfestellungsklage72-300x169.jpg 300w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwalts-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-Musterfestellungsklage72-768x432.jpg 768w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwalts-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Benz-Musterfestellungsklage72.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />					</a>
							</div>
						<h4 class="uagb-post__title uagb-post__text">
				<a href="https://ru.law/en/musterfeststellungsklage-gegen-die-daimler-ag/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer">vzbv files another model declaratory action – Volkswagen is followed by Daimler AG</a>
			</h4>
						<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post-grid-byline'>
							</div>
							<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post__excerpt'>
					<p>Bad news for the car manufacturers from Stuttgart. The Federal Association of Consumer Organizations (vzbv) is being…				</div>
			
									</article>
																<article class="uagb-post__inner-wrap">								<div class='uagb-post__image'>
									<a href="https://ru.law/en/verjaehrung-bei-mercedes-benz-zum-ende-des-jahres-2021/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer" class='uagb-image-ratio-inherit'><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large" alt="Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jp" srcset="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6-300x169.jpg 300w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6-768x432.jpg 768w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Mercedes-Vito-GLC-Marco-Polo-Euro6.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />					</a>
							</div>
						<h4 class="uagb-post__title uagb-post__text">
				<a href="https://ru.law/en/verjaehrung-bei-mercedes-benz-zum-ende-des-jahres-2021/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer">Limitation period at Mercedes-Benz at the end of 2021</a>
			</h4>
						<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post-grid-byline'>
							</div>
							<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post__excerpt'>
					<p>Do you drive a Mercedes-Benz GLC, V-Class, Vito or Marco Polo? Then you should note that...				</div>
			
									</article>
																<article class="uagb-post__inner-wrap">								<div class='uagb-post__image'>
									<a href="https://ru.law/en/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer" class='uagb-image-ratio-inherit'><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-1024x576.png" class="attachment-large size-large" alt="" srcset="https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-1024x576.png 1024w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-300x169.png 300w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz-768x432.png 768w, https://ru.law/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rogert-Ulbrich-Rechtsanwaelte-Kanzlei-Abgasskandal-Urteile-Daimler-Mercedes-Benz.png 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />					</a>
							</div>
						<h4 class="uagb-post__title uagb-post__text">
				<a href="https://ru.law/en/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-vorsaetzlich-sittenwidrige-schaedigung/" target="_self" rel="bookmark noopener noreferrer">Judgment against Daimler AG – intentional immoral damage</a>
			</h4>
						<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post-grid-byline'>
							</div>
							<div class='uagb-post__text uagb-post__excerpt'>
					<p>In its judgment of January 28, 2022, the Stuttgart Regional Court (LG) sentenced Daimler AG to…				</div>
			
									</article>
											</div>
			</div></div>
</div></section><p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://ru.law/en/urteil-gegen-daimler-ag-schadensersatz-fuer-mercedes-sprinter/">Urteil gegen Daimler AG &#8211; Schadensersatz für Mercedes Sprinter</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://ru.law/en">R&amp;U</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>