<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>maklerprovision halbteilung Archive - R&amp;U</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ru.law/en/tag/maklerprovision-halbteilung/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ru.law/en/tag/maklerprovision-halbteilung/</link>
	<description>Consumer lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 09:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	hourly	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Halbteilungsgrundsatz nach § 656c und § 656d BGB einfach erklärt</title>
		<link>https://ru.law/en/halbteilungsgrundsatz-makler/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco Rogert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Immobilienrecht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geld zurück]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halbteilungsgrundsatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maklerprovision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maklerprovision halbteilung]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">https://ru.law/?p=99586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Wann Käufer beim Immobilienkauf zu viel Maklerprovision gezahlt haben und worauf es ankommt Seit Dezember 2020 darf ein Makler beim Verkauf einer Wohnung oder eines [&#8230;]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://ru.law/en/halbteilungsgrundsatz-makler/">Halbteilungsgrundsatz nach § 656c und § 656d BGB einfach erklärt</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://ru.law/en">R&amp;U</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-wann-kaufer-beim-immobilienkauf-zu-viel-maklerprovision-gezahlt-haben-und-worauf-es-ankommt"><strong>When buyers have paid too much real estate agent commission when purchasing property, and what matters.</strong></h2>



<p>Since December 2020, real estate agents are no longer permitted to unilaterally pass on their commission to the buyer when selling an apartment or single-family home. The principle of equal division, as stipulated in Sections 656c and 656d of the German Civil Code (BGB), mandates that the buyer and seller share the commission equally. If this principle has been violated, you, as the buyer, can reclaim the commission you have paid. Rogert &amp; Ulbrich will review your real estate agent contract and enforce any legitimate claims for reimbursement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-was-besagt-der-halbteilungsgrundsatz"><strong>What does the principle of equal division state?</strong></h2>



<p>The principle of equal sharing governs who pays the real estate agent&#039;s commission (also called brokerage fee) when buying property. Since the law on the distribution of real estate agent costs, which came into force on December 23, 2020, the following applies: When brokering apartments and single-family homes, buyers and sellers must pay the commission in the same amount. This is regulated in Sections 656c and 656d of the German Civil Code (BGB).</p>



<p>The underlying principle is consumer protection. Before the reform, it was common practice in many regions for the seller to hire the real estate agent, but the buyer was then charged the entire commission. Anyone wanting to buy a house had little room for negotiation and had to pay the full commission. The legislature wanted to end this one-sided distribution of costs. Since then, real estate agents are no longer allowed to charge the buyer more than the seller.</p>



<p>Did you pay the full real estate agent&#039;s commission when you bought your house? Have it checked whether the principle of equal division was violated and whether you can reclaim part of it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-fur-wen-gilt-der-halbteilungsgrundsatz"><strong>For whom does the principle of equal division apply?</strong></h2>



<p>The principle of equal division does not apply to every brokerage contract. Section 656b of the German Civil Code (BGB) defines its personal and material scope. Two conditions are crucial:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>The buyer is a consumer</strong>The consumer protection regulations only apply if the buyer is acting as a consumer within the meaning of Section 13 of the German Civil Code (BGB), i.e., not for commercial or self-employed purposes. Commercial buyers and entrepreneurs are not covered by this protection.</li>



<li><strong>The object of purchase is an apartment or a single-family house</strong>Purely commercial properties and multi-family houses that are rented to many parties are excluded.</li>
</ul>



<p>The Federal Court of Justice clarified the scope of application on March 6, 2025. According to this ruling, the principle of equal division also applies if a single-family home has a subordinate commercial use option, such as a small office or a garage as an extension. The decisive factor is that the property must be recognizably intended primarily for the residential use of a single household, as far as the real estate agent is concerned.</p>



<p>Unsure whether your purchase falls under the principle of equal division? A brief legal assessment provides clarity before the statute of limitations expires.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-doppeltatigkeit-oder-einseitige-beauftragung-656c-und-656d-im-vergleich"><strong>Dual role or unilateral commissioning: Sections 656c and 656d compared</strong></h2>



<p>The law distinguishes between two basic scenarios. Which rule applies depends on whether the real estate agent is acting for both parties or only for one.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Dual employment (§ 656c BGB)</strong>The real estate agent acts for both buyer and seller and obtains a commission from both. In that case, they may only accept an equal commission from each party. If one party is exempt from paying a commission, this exemption automatically applies to the other.</li>



<li><strong>Unilateral commission (§ 656d BGB)</strong>Only one party, usually the seller, commissions the real estate agent. The other party&#039;s assumption of costs is only valid if the commissioning party pays at least the same share themselves. The buyer may therefore never pay more than the seller.</li>
</ul>



<p>In both cases, the result is the same: the buyer must not be burdened more than the seller. Agreements that circumvent this are invalid.</p>



<p>Not sure which scenario applies to your situation? The brokerage agreement and commission agreement will provide the answer. We&#039;ll organize the documents for you.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-wann-der-makler-zu-viel-verlangt-hat-typische-verstosse"><strong>When the real estate agent has demanded too much: typical violations</strong></h2>



<p>A violation of the principle of equal division is not always obvious. It is often hidden in the contract&#039;s structure. These scenarios occur particularly frequently in practice:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>The buyer pays more than the seller.</strong>The buyer pays the full commission, while the seller pays nothing or less.</li>



<li><strong>Hidden transfer via the purchase price</strong>The seller engages the real estate agent, but the purchase price is reduced in the sales contract, and the buyer then assumes the entire commission. The Federal Court of Justice has also ruled on such circumvention schemes.</li>



<li><strong>Commissioning by a third party</strong>The brokerage agreement is not concluded by the seller himself, but by a person close to him, such as his spouse. This does not negate the buyer&#039;s protection.</li>



<li><strong>Different commission rates</strong>Buyer and seller each conclude a brokerage agreement, but agree on different commission rates.</li>
</ul>



<p>If any of these scenarios sound familiar, it&#039;s worth carefully reviewing your contract. Even minor deviations can invalidate the entire commission agreement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-welche-folgen-ein-verstoss-hat-unwirksamkeit-und-ruckforderung"><strong>Consequences of a violation: invalidity and recovery of funds</strong></h2>



<p>If a commission agreement violates the principle of equal division, it is invalid. An important point to note is that there is no reduction to preserve its validity. This means the agreement is not simply reduced to the permissible half, but is entirely void.</p>



<p>This offers you, as the buyer, a significant advantage. You don&#039;t have to settle for a refund of the overpaid half. In the event of a breach of contract, the real estate agent&#039;s commission claim is completely forfeited, meaning the entire commission paid can be reclaimed. The legal basis for this is Section 812 of the German Civil Code (BGB), which addresses claims arising from unjust enrichment. The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed this right to full reimbursement in its ruling of March 6, 2025.</p>



<p>The classification of the specific violation determines the amount of your claim. Have your case reviewed before any potential claims expire.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-was-kaufer-jetzt-tun-sollten"><strong>What buyers should do now</strong></h2>



<p>The principle of equal division is just one of several ways to reclaim paid real estate agent commissions. Other options include revocation of distance selling contracts and the invalidity of faulty online order buttons. A systematic review will determine which approach is right for your specific situation. These steps will help:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Collect documents</strong>Brokerage agreement, commission agreement, notarized purchase agreement and proof of payment of the commission.</li>



<li><strong>Check text form</strong>Brokerage agreements for apartments and single-family homes require written form according to § 656a of the German Civil Code (BGB). If this requirement is not met, the agreement is invalid for this reason alone.</li>



<li><strong>Note the statute of limitations.</strong>Claims for reimbursement generally expire after three years. The period begins at the end of the year in which you made the payment and became aware of the circumstances.</li>



<li><strong>Have it legally reviewed</strong>A legal assessment clarifies whether a violation has occurred and how high the claim for reimbursement is.</li>
</ul>



<p>The sooner you act, the more likely you are to meet deadlines. Send us your documents and we will review your options for claiming a refund.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-rogert-amp-ulbrich-ihre-anwalte-im-immobilienrecht"><strong>Rogert &amp; Ulbrich – Your lawyers in real estate law</strong></h2>



<p>Rogert &amp; Ulbrich has been consistently representing consumers against excessive demands and invalid contract clauses for years. The firm was founded by Dr. Marco Rogert and Tobias Ulbrich and has handled over 40,000 cases and filed more than 25,000 lawsuits. In real estate law, the focus is on protecting buyers, particularly regarding real estate agent commissions and the allocation of agent fees.</p>



<p>We review your brokerage agreement, classify your case according to the applicable review criteria, and enforce your claims for reimbursement, both out of court against the broker and, if necessary, in court. You can conveniently retain our services online; we operate nationwide and, if you have legal expenses insurance, we bill your insurer directly.</p>



<p>Did you pay a real estate agent&#039;s commission when buying a property and suspect a violation of the principle of equal division? Get in touch and secure your claims.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-faqs-haufig-gestellte-fragen-zum-halbteilungsgrundsatz"><strong>FAQs – <strong>Frequently asked questions about the principle of equal division</strong></strong></h2>


<div class="wp-block-uagb-faq uagb-faq__outer-wrap uagb-block-ed0fa9cc uagb-faq-icon-row uagb-faq-layout-accordion uagb-faq-expand-first-true uagb-faq-inactive-other-true uagb-faq__wrap uagb-buttons-layout-wrap uagb-faq-equal-height" data-faqtoggle="true" role="tablist"><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-f9785a0e" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">What is the principle of equal division in real estate agent commissions?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>The principle of equal sharing states that when selling an apartment or a single-family home, the buyer and seller share the real estate agent&#039;s commission equally. This is regulated in Sections 656c and 656d of the German Civil Code (BGB). The buyer must therefore not be burdened with a greater share than the seller. The aim is to protect consumers from unfairly disproportionate real estate agent fees.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-eef02c53" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">Since when has the principle of equal division applied?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>The principle of equal sharing has been in effect since December 23, 2020. On that day, the law on the distribution of brokerage fees for the sale of apartments and single-family homes came into force. These rules do not apply to brokerage agreements concluded before that date. The decisive factor is the date the contract was concluded.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-7b6999cf" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">For which properties does the principle of equal division apply?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>It applies to the purchase of apartments and single-family homes by consumers. Purely commercial properties and multi-family homes rented to multiple tenants are exempt. According to case law, minor commercial use, such as a small office within a residential building, is permissible. The decisive factor is that the property primarily serves as the residence of a single household.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-a5f0bb69" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">What is the difference between § 656c and § 656d of the German Civil Code (BGB)?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>Section 656c of the German Civil Code (BGB) addresses dual agency: The real estate agent acts for both buyer and seller and may only accept the same commission from each. Section 656d of the BGB addresses unilateral commissioning, where only one party engages the real estate agent. In this case, cost reimbursement by the other party is only valid if the instructing party pays at least the same share. In both cases, the buyer may not pay more than the seller.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-28b6f38a" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">As a buyer, do I only ever have to pay half the commission?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>Under the principle of equal division, the buyer may not be burdened more heavily than the seller. Any agreement that imposes more than half the costs on the buyer is invalid. If such a violation occurs, the real estate agent&#039;s commission claim is forfeited entirely. You may then not have to pay any commission at all.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-922e0bf1" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">Does the principle of equal division also apply to commercial real estate?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>No. The principle of equal division only protects consumers when buying apartments and single-family homes. Commercial buyers and buyers of purely commercial properties are not covered by Sections 656c and 656d of the German Civil Code (BGB). In these cases, the commission can still be freely agreed upon.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-910f255b" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">What happens if the real estate agent violates the principle of equal division?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>If the commission agreement violates the principle of equal division, it is invalid. A reduction to the permissible half to preserve its validity is not possible. The agreement is entirely void, meaning the real estate agent has no claim to the commission. You can reclaim any amounts already paid.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-44975cc3" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">Can I reclaim a real estate agent&#039;s commission that I&#039;ve already paid?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>Yes, if the principle of equal division is violated, you can reclaim the full amount of the commission paid. The legal basis is the claim for unjust enrichment under Section 812 of the German Civil Code (BGB). The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed this right to full reimbursement in its ruling of March 6, 2025. The prerequisite is that a violation actually occurred.</p></div></div><div class="wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-7ab03cea" role="tab" tabindex="0"><div class="uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions">			<span class="uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M432 256c0 17.69-14.33 32.01-32 32.01H256v144c0 17.69-14.33 31.99-32 31.99s-32-14.3-32-31.99v-144H48c-17.67 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.33-31.99 32-31.99H192v-144c0-17.69 14.33-32.01 32-32.01s32 14.32 32 32.01v144h144C417.7 224 432 238.3 432 256z"></path></svg>
							</span>
						<span class="uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap">
								<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox= "0 0 448 512"><path d="M400 288h-352c-17.69 0-32-14.32-32-32.01s14.31-31.99 32-31.99h352c17.69 0 32 14.3 32 31.99S417.7 288 400 288z"></path></svg>
							</span>
			<span class="uagb-question">How long do I have to reclaim the commission?</span></div><div class="uagb-faq-content"><p>Claims for reimbursement generally expire after three years. The period begins at the end of the year in which you made the payment and became aware of the circumstances giving rise to the claim. After this period has expired, the real estate agent can refuse repayment. Therefore, you should not let your case languish for too long.</p></div></div></div><p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://ru.law/en/halbteilungsgrundsatz-makler/">Halbteilungsgrundsatz nach § 656c und § 656d BGB einfach erklärt</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://ru.law/en">R&amp;U</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>